SCLM Poll Reporting

Have you noticed how a two or three point lead for Bush is a "slim lead," whereas a two or three-point lead for Kerry (depending on whether you make it three-way or two-way -- the latter being more realistic with Nader off the ballot in so many states) is a "statistical dead heat?"  What the heck is up with that?



Display:


SCLM bias (none / 0)

I also remember the post RNC bounce that the SCLM claimed put Kerry on the ropes. The Kerry campaign was in a meltdown. The election was practically over.

I sometimes wonder if the only people who still believe in the SCLM are liberals. I'd like to see us move from SCLM to something stronger. I don't know what that might be, but it's clear that CNN is as biased towards Bush as Faux News and MSNBC is only a little bit behind.

I used to have a little respect for Chris Matthews until his last interview with John O'Neil. It was obvious that his network had given him a smackdown for being too hard on conservatives and his O'Neil interview was payback.

The SCLM is responsive to the corporate agenda of it's advertisers. There's a great DVD called "Constructing Public Opinion" that demonstrates the media never covers issues from a liberal perspective.

Part of my morning blog constitutional is going to the Dailyhowler linked text

I don't leave home without it. It keeps the SCLM assault on my senses in perspective.

by Gary Boatwright on Tue Oct 05, 2004 at 01:14:33 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.